Investigation · Media Consolidation · Corporate Power

Who Controls What You Watch

And why it's starting to look a lot like what they watch in Hungary.

Do you really think you decide what's on? Here's who actually does.

Six men now control most of what America sees on television, reads in major newspapers, and scrolls through on social media. In the past two years, one after another, they settled lawsuits with the president, killed endorsements, spiked stories, fired hosts who criticized him, and restructured editorial pages to favor his agenda — all while seeking regulatory approval for billion-dollar mergers that required the White House's blessing. This is not conspiracy. It is a documented business pattern. And you are the product.

Larry & David Ellison
Net worth: ~$360B · Oracle founder
CBS News (via Paramount Skydance) Paramount Pictures, BET, Nickelodeon MTV, Comedy Central, Paramount+ 28 local TV stations TikTok U.S. (Oracle, operational control) Bid for CNN / Warner Bros. Discovery
→ Lead case study below
Elon Musk
Net worth: ~$1.2T · Tesla, SpaceX
X (formerly Twitter) — 600M+ users Self-described as "digital town square" Promoted far-right content after purchase Took credit for helping elect Trump 2024
→ Also see: DOGE investigation
Jeff Bezos
Net worth: ~$240B · Amazon founder
The Washington Post (since 2013) Amazon MGM Studios Killed Harris endorsement, Oct. 2024 Restricted Post opinions to "free markets" Bought Melania documentary: $40M
→ Amazon holds $10B+ in NSA contracts
Mark Zuckerberg
Net worth: ~$215B · Meta CEO
Facebook — 3B+ users Instagram, WhatsApp, Threads Eliminated fact-checking Jan. 6, 2025 Appointed Trump allies to top posts Settled Trump lawsuit: $25M
→ Fact-checking: proven effective, then killed
Rupert Murdoch
Net worth: ~$20B · News Corp
Fox News (primary cable news for ~2M nightly) Wall Street Journal, New York Post Paid $787M to settle Dominion lawsuit Hosts admitted on record: knew claims were false
→ Dominion discovery: internal texts documented
L.A. Times / Sun / Others
Pattern repeating at regional level
L.A. Times: Patrick Soon-Shiong killed Harris endorsement Baltimore Sun: sold to Sinclair exec David Smith Sinclair: 185 local TV stations, conservative mandate Univision: pivoted under new ownership
→ Local news: the quiet takeover

This Is Not Coincidence. It Is a Business Model.

In a functioning democracy, the press exists to hold power accountable — including the power of presidents. In 2025, America's major media companies discovered a different model: settle the lawsuit, cancel the host, kill the endorsement, and get your merger approved. Robert Reich, former U.S. Secretary of Labor, described it as a simple exchange: favorable coverage for regulatory favors. The documented record bears him out.

The Playbook — documented across multiple companies, 2024–2025
  1. Billionaire buys or controls a major media outlet — or seeks government approval to do so.
  2. The president threatens the outlet — via lawsuit, license review, FCC pressure, or public demand for firing specific hosts.
  3. The outlet capitulates — settles the lawsuit, cancels the show, kills the story, or shifts editorial direction.
  4. The regulatory approval comes through. The merger proceeds. The billionaire profits.
  5. The audience gets less truth. The business continues.

This is not how a free press is supposed to work. But it is exactly how a captured press has always worked — in Hungary under Viktor Orbán, in Russia under Putin, and in every other country where concentrated wealth and concentrated political power found each other useful. A Hungarian journalist writing in The Atlantic in early 2025 put it directly: "As I watch from afar what's happening to the free press in the United States... it all looks very familiar. The MAGA authorities have learned Orbán's lessons well."

"At a meeting of the U.S. Conservative Political Action Conference in 2022, the Hungarian prime minister advised that the Republican pathway to power 'required having their own media outlets.'"

— Nonprofit Quarterly, March 2026, citing CPAC 2022 proceedings

A Sequence of Events That Speaks for Itself

Larry Ellison is the founder of Oracle and, depending on the day, the second- or third-richest person on earth. He is a documented Trump donor, participated in a post-2020 election phone call to discuss contesting Trump's loss, and co-sponsored Trump's military parade in Washington in June 2025. His son David runs the media empire. Here is the documented timeline.

On the Record · Axios, September 18, 2025

Axios, citing multiple sources, reported that David Ellison promised the president "sweeping changes" at CNN as a condition of the Warner Bros. deal — and that Trump had "gushed over the Ellisons," telling people he expects favorable changes to CNN under their ownership. Pete Hegseth, Secretary of Defense, stated publicly: "The sooner David Ellison takes over that network the better."

Source: Axios — axios.com

The Ellisons Are the Latest. The Pattern Started Earlier.

The Ellison sequence is the most acute documented case, but it sits inside a broader wave of billionaire media capitulation that followed Trump's return to power. Each case has its own paper trail.

$16M
Paramount paid Trump — a case his own lawyers called meritless — to get a merger approved
Source: NPR / PBS, July 2025
$15M
ABC/Disney paid Trump to settle a George Stephanopoulos defamation claim, also while seeking regulatory approvals
Source: PBS NewsHour
$25M
Meta paid Trump to settle a lawsuit over banning his accounts after January 6, 2021
Source: PBS / Common Dreams
$787M
Fox News paid Dominion Voting after discovery showed hosts knew the 2020 fraud claims were false and promoted them anyway
Source: Court records / Associated Press
Documented · Washington Post / PBS NewsHour, February 2025

Jeff Bezos — owner of The Washington Post and founder of Amazon, which holds tens of billions in federal government contracts — killed the Post's planned endorsement of Kamala Harris in October 2024. In February 2025, he announced the Post's opinion section would henceforth be restricted to defending "personal liberties and free markets," explicitly excluding opposing perspectives. The Post's opinion editor immediately resigned. The Post's former executive editor, Marty Baron, said publicly: "There is no doubt in my mind that he is doing this out of fear of the consequences for his other business interests."

Source: PBS NewsHour — pbs.org
Documented · January 6, 2025

Meta's Mark Zuckerberg announced on January 6, 2025 — the fourth anniversary of the Capitol attack — that Meta was eliminating its fact-checking program across Facebook and Instagram. The program had been independently shown to be effective at reducing belief in falsehoods and reducing how often misinformation was shared. Zuckerberg simultaneously appointed Trump allies to top company positions. Days later, Bezos, Zuckerberg, Musk, and other tech billionaires sat in prominent positions at Trump's inauguration.

Source: Common Cause / Salon, January 2025
Documented · The New Yorker / Jane Mayer · 2013 · PBS / Citizen Koch

This pattern didn't start with Ellison. In 2013, Academy Award-nominated filmmakers Carl Deal and Tia Lessin completed a documentary called Citizen Koch — set to air on PBS stations nationwide — documenting how billionaire money shaped Wisconsin politics and crushed workers' right to organize. David Koch had donated an estimated $23 million to public television and sat on the boards of PBS affiliates in both New York and Boston.

When a separate PBS documentary critical of Koch aired, he threatened to pull his seven-figure donation. PBS executives got the message without being asked twice. Internal emails — obtained by Jane Mayer of The New Yorker — show PBS officials pressuring the filmmakers to change the title and remove the Koch storyline entirely. One PBS executive told the filmmakers directly: "We live in a world where we have to be aware that people with power have power." Funding for Citizen Koch was pulled. The film never aired on PBS.

The filmmakers called it what it was: "This wasn't a failed negotiation or a divergence of visions. It was censorship, pure and simple."

Source: Jane Mayer, The New Yorker (2013) · Truthout · PR Watch / Center for Media and Democracy — truthout.org
The Law That Started It All · Telecommunications Act of 1996 · Signed by President Bill Clinton

The billionaire takeover of your local airwaves didn't happen overnight. It was unlocked by a single piece of legislation that most Americans have never heard of — passed with almost no public debate while the media companies it would benefit covered it in near silence.

Before 1996, federal law capped how many radio stations a single company could own — 40 nationwide. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 eliminated that cap entirely. It passed the Senate 91–5 and the House 414–16. Both parties handed the public airwaves to corporations in a single afternoon. The promised benefits — lower rates, more competition, 1.5 million new jobs — never materialized. Instead, cable rates rose, the industry lost half a million jobs, and a wave of mergers began that has never stopped.

Within five years, the number of radio station owners nationwide collapsed from 5,100 to 3,800. Clear Channel — now called iHeartMedia — went from owning a handful of stations to over 1,600. Local news disappeared. Local voices disappeared. What replaced them was national outrage programming, repeated across hundreds of markets, designed not to inform but to inflame.

Sources: FCC records · Center for Public Integrity · Wikipedia (Telecommunications Act of 1996) · EBSCO Research Starters · 35000watts.com
Local Example · Minneapolis–Saint Paul · AM950 KTNF

This isn't abstract. It happened in Minnesota. AM950 KTNF was a progressive talk radio station serving the Twin Cities — one of the few local independent voices on the dial. It was sold for $250,000. It is now a sports station. The community voices, the local journalism, the independent perspective — gone. What happened to AM950 is what happened to thousands of stations in thousands of communities across America after 1996. The airwaves are public property. Congress gave them away.

Source: Local record / documented sale · Context: Telecommunications Act of 1996 consolidation wave

"It is not a sign of a healthy democracy when billionaires are buying up all of the means of cultural consumption."

— Steven Buckley, Lecturer in Media and Digital Sociology, City St George's, University of London — quoted in Jacobin, September 2025

The News Isn't Broken. It's Working Exactly As Designed.

When a 60 Minutes segment documenting torture gets killed hours before air — after being legally cleared, after 40 consistent testimonies, after independent forensic expert review — the story that never airs is the real story. You didn't see it. You may not know it existed. That invisibility is the point.

Dan Rather, who anchored CBS News for 24 years, warned directly: "We all have to be concerned about the consolidation of huge billionaires getting control of nearly all of the major news outlets." He specifically said the Ellison takeover was "a particularly tough time for anybody working at CBS News" and that if the Ellisons acquired CNN, "it would change CNN forever."

The working-class Americans who watch these networks, who share these posts, who trust these brands — they are not the audience being served. They are the product. The audience being served is the administration that controls the regulatory approvals the billionaires need.

On the Record · Former CBS Correspondent Sharyn Alfonsi, internal memo, December 21, 2025

"The public will correctly identify this as corporate censorship." Alfonsi noted the story had been reviewed repeatedly by senior producers, news executives, and CBS legal and standards divisions. She said she and her producer had asked Bari Weiss for a call to discuss the decision. "She did not afford us that courtesy."

Source: CNN reporting on internal CBS memo — CNN.com

Independent journalism still exists. Local journalists, nonprofit newsrooms, and single-reporter outlets broke many of the stories cited on this page. They have no mergers to protect. They have no FCC licenses to lose. They have no president whose favor they need. Supporting them is not a luxury. It is how the truth survives what is happening to the institutions that used to carry it.

The Future for Our Children

Crisis of Truth is independent investigative journalism. No advertisers. No sponsors. Every claim sourced to federal records, court documents, or named primary sources.

Read More Investigations